txtismt xtismt mtxt s t x m mt m x t t m ti x t t i xt t x s i t s mt tis s i m m s t xt s t tx tismt t xti t m s i i m s s s t mt m s t t t t t x x m s t x i t s i i x t s i txti t m
txtismt xtismt mtxt
s t
x m mt
m x t
t m
ti x t t
i xt
t x
s i t s
mt tis
s i m
m
s t xt s t
tx
tismt t
xti t m
s
i i m
s s s t
mt
m s
t t t
t t x
x m
s t x i
t s i
i x
t s i
txti t m
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>
LidThemeComplexScript>
terminab Ind
termina Indeterm ableInde
rminable ndetermin leIn ermi able ndet min
Inde minableI term
leIndete ble ndetermin
bleIndet rminableI determina leIndeter inableInd erminableIn ete inableInd
rmina eIndetermi ble
terminabl ble
ndetermi ble eterminable erm
leIndete inableInd erminableI
ete inableIn terminab
Indeterm ble terminab
ete min leIn eter
nab eIndeter leI erminabl Indetermi ble
determ nab Ind ermi
bleIndet rminableI eter bleIndet abl Ind
ermi abl det rmi ter
leI min eIn
ter bleI det min
leIn ete nab eIndeterm abl ter
ete min leIn ete inab
However diff nces etwe l va atio n speech nat au mentation th iqu se cti udi put. re e t e main ypes set ena syn s. most mpor fe rd sio al osi n and rity dit desc s h al roduc , as n c y t man ech nd the ea hic nde out Sp ch i the ombi tion natural a ear. Speech synt sis tems all to cha cter ics. nol cr es a ave syn etic f ant hes onc tiv syn . Ea ech log has it eng nd s, e in uses nthe sys det mine ppr s g erally Edi pos Co nati ase Con tena e ch n sy hesi or ther) o egmen recor d speec . Ge conca ena ive sy esis pro es the mos ural so sis. H wever, dif erence betwe l variat ns in peech the nat of au atic s menta on wa th tech en cau lfuncti ns a io out . Ther e three ypes su of c catena ive syn hesi . The most features a wor ogical mposit y. dit] es how a tural roduct as seen cl e huma speech and ity is ase w whic nders the outpu Speec s the pe ct combinat of natur nd clear eech s thesis sys ms usu y try maximize b teristics. key tec ologie cr ates a wave o ic forma synthesis ncaten e speec ynthes Each te ology as it s and knesse , and he in ded uses of sis sy determi he ap oach i gener used. compo on n ve Base Con atenative c in syn is (or ng ther) of se ents re orde speech. Ge ally, conc enati synth sis pr duces the mo natura sou d synthesi r, di rence ween nat ri ons the n re of c seg ntati wavele h tech s often malfun ns au o outp t. The are th e main type of co tive nthesi The most mportant fe s of a s physiolo compos n a ty. [E ] desc bes how a roduct, as een clo ely he huma spe h and he cl he ease wi which to u stand th utput. Spe h is th per ect combina of na r. Spee synth s sys s usual y tr imize th ch eristic wo key tec nologi s crea a wav of sy hetic ynthesis c catena eech sy thes s. Each tech ogy has it stren s and es, an he int nded es of synthesis s etermin he ap ach i enerall use compositi Concatenat e Base oncate tive ain synthesi string gethe nts re orded spee y, conc nativ ynthe s produ es t atural ound synthe . Howe r, differe es betw en n io in s and th ture of tomat segme ng tech ofte ause functi s audio ou ut. T e are types s of conc nthesis most mport features o a word s ph siolo cal co position a rity. [ t] des bes ho a nat al pr ct, as seen human ech a the c rity is the hich to stand t ut. Spe is the combina natural d c peech synt is sys sually ry t maximiz bot characteri ics. key es cre tes a wave c forma synth s con tenativ spe hesis. echnolo y ha its s engths and w ses, an the tended use a synth will dete e the ap oach i ge erally used. [Edit] omposi ion C caten ve Bas Concat ve chai ynthes (or stri ng to ther) recorde speech conca nativ ynthes produc he most l sound thesi
both aracteristi Two k s creat a wav of syn ic fo s conca ive spee sis. E ch echnol gy has s stre ths a d weak sses, nd the int nded u es of synthesis s stem wi l de the approach generall . [Edit ompos on Co e Based Co atena e cha synth s (or ringi toget er) of gments ecorded sp Genera concat nati e syn esis p oduces the most n l sound nthesi However, d ferences b wee ariatio ee and re of au gment tion wavelengt tec es of unction udio ou put. here are t ee ma types bset conc tive syn esis. The m importan tures of word i physiol gica compositi ity. [Edit descr es how a natur l pr duct, seen c y the h n speec and he clarity ease w which t outp eech i he per omb of nat ral Speech thesis lly try to mize char teris Two key chnol es cr tes a w ve o thetic mant s thesis con e spee esis. Ea tech logy h s its tre gths a d weak ses, a the tende of a s ystem will rmine appr ch is ally us [Edi compo tion Co cate tive Based oncate ative chai s (or stri g togeth of s ments orded spee . Gene ly, co native thesis rodu es th most ural s d synt . Howev diffe be atural aria speech and he nat automat c se mentati n wa length tec ques en ca nctions au utput ere a thre types set o oncat tive sy thes s. The mos import nt feature f a s physi logi al com ition purity. [ it] d ribes al prod , as se n cl ely the hu spee and t clar y is ase with hich to und and the t. Speec he pe natio f nat l and ar. Sp ech synthe ms usu try to imize both ristics. T y techn gies eates wave o syn hetic orman thesis c ative s ch sy esis. ach techno its st gths a weak sses, d the inten sy esis m will eter ine th pproac s gen rally used. dit] positio Con tenative B ed Concate tive ch in s thesis (or rin gether f segm ts re rded ech. Genera enative thesi roduc the mo t na und sy thesi Howe fferenc between natu al va ation n speech an the nat re o automatic s wavelen techniques ften ca se m functions ut. Ther re thr s subs of con e synthesi e mos porta feat f a wor s phy logic composi ion nd purity. Edit] scribes ho ral produc seen ely the hu peech a the combin cla ity the e se ith wh st the t. Spe ch is the p fect
combin natural and lear. S eech thesis tems us ally ry to aximiz both har cteristics. o key echno ies cre tes yntheti orman ynthe concat nati h synt is. Ea h tech has it gths d weak ses, and he int ed use f a synthe s sys will e the pproach is used. [E compos tion Conca nativ ased Co cate tive ain sy thesis r stri ging togeth ) of segmen corde rally, atenative nthesis prod es the most atu n ynthesi . Ho ever, diffe nces b en natu va in speech the natu of aut mat c segm ntatio gth tech ques often ause m ctions io out . There thre main et of conc ative sy esis. he mo mportant f tures a word hysiolo al comp siti n and urity Edit] cribes a natur produc see ly the uman nd the clari y is t ease w h which to ndersta d th output. Spe e perfect nation o natur and r. Speech nthesi ystems lly try maximi e bo h cha cteri cs. Tw ey tec gies cr es a w syn formant synt catenative peech nthes . Each chnolo has i s str gths sses, and ntend ses o a syn system l det ine t approa h is generally ed. [E t] composi en e Based caten ive ch thesis (or nging t ther) f segm nts re orded peech rally, c atenat e syn esis ces the sound s sis. How differe betwee nat variat s in ech a the na ure auto tic se ent ength te iques malfunctio audio utpu here are ree ma n t pes su set of onca nativ synth The mos mportant f f a w d is p ysiolog cal mposition purity. it] d cribes how a natu produc , as seen closel an speech d the is the ease with wh ch t nderstand e out . Spe h i ect comb ion of atur l and lear. eech sy thes syst s usually tr o maxi ze both cha cteristics. key t log tes a wave syntheti orman synth concatena ve spe synth . Each nology as i s str gths weakn es, an intend uses o nth stem wi l de the approa gener used [Edit osition ncate ive B ed Conc tena ve chain s thesis (or string her) o nts r orded ech. Gen ally, conca ive syn produces e most atur l sound sy ever, d erenc betwe natural vari n spee h a d the ure of a omatic seg tion wa echni es of cause lfunct audio o There three ain ty es sub of co atenative s . The most ortant f s of a is p siolo al composit urity. [Ed escri how a atura ct, as n clo y the uman sp ech nd the cla y is t e ease wit whi derst the ut. Spee e fect ination of n and Speech synt esis stems ual to maximize oth ch acteri Two k chnolog es c ates wave o synthe ic f rmant ynthe concatenat e speec syn esis. Each gy has its s rengths and esses, in ded f a syn hesi system will eterm e the is g erall sed. [ t] com ion Con tive Ba oncat ative chain thesis or stringin f s recor speec Gene lly, c ncaten tive s hesis ces the st nat l sound thesi Howe , differen en nat ral v iatio ch and the ature matic s gmen ation w vele h techniqu ofte ause ons au outpu Ther are t e main type concat ive s hesis The mos imp eatur of a rd is siolog composi nd puri [Edit descri es how nat ct, as s close speec nd the ity is e with to unde and th ou put. S eech i he per combin n of n ural and c ech synthe s syste s us ly try t ximize bot chara teristi s. T o key echno creates wave o ynthet ormant thesis catenati spee synt hn gy h stren s and sse he inte ded ses of a sy hesis s stem will termi e approa enerall sed. it] c oncaten ve Base Con enative ch n syn sis ( stri ing t ther) egments rded sp Genera ly, oncatenati s produc the m al soun ynthesi . Ho ver, ffere n natural riatio in spe and the re of auto tic seg enta elengt te hnique often use ma unctions au io out e are t main pes s t of conca ive syn sis. T most imp ant f tures a word is gical positi nd puri Edit] descr es how natural seen cl the hum ch and clari ease wi to und tan ut. Spe is t perfe combina ion f nat al and clear. peec sis sy ms usu ly tr to maximize b th c cs. Two y tec logie creat a wav of syn heti forman syn oncate ati e spee h synt is. Ea techn logy s its d weakn and intend of a s nthe s system w mine the a ch is g ally used. [ it] compos ion Con aten e Based ve chain nthesi ng togethe f segmen recor d spe Generally concat tive s sis pro es the ost atura sound nthesi Howeve fferenc betwee ral ons in peec e nature o omati gment ion w gth tec ques en ca malfun tion audio out t. The e are thre ain of conc nativ ynthe s. The most feat re of a w is phy ogical co ion and Edit] d scrib s w a na ural p seen sely hum eech an he cla y is t ease th w o under output ech is the p fect c inatio natura ar. h syn sis stems usuall try to m charac stics. hnolog creat sy ti synthe conca ativ speech sy ach tec nology ha ngths aknes , and ntend ses of a thesis tem wi etermine th roach erally u . [Edit composi Conca ative sed Concate n synth r stri g tog th ) of s gments speech enerally, catenat synthe produc the mo atura ound . Howe , diff rence etwe natural v n spee atur autom c se entatio aveleng nique ten a unctions aud o output. re are ee main pes of concat ive synthesi The most rtant f res o wor is physiological c osition and urity. [E ibes a na produc en se peech the c s the se w which under the ou eech he pe ct c binati of nat al and clea h synt ystem sual y to m mize both rist key te ies cre a synth c form t synthes native sp h synthesis. Each technol y has s st weakne , and the i ed use a synthe system will determine t proac used. it] c ositi Concatenativ Conca ative synt (or s ri ing to ether) segme s rec ed s erally, c atenat thesis produ es the most ral sou ynthe . How ferenc betwee natu var ions in s nature autom c seg tation wavel niques n cause mal nction udio o put. re a e three n types t of ve synthesis. Th ant fea es of word physiologic ition and pu ity. [ t] des ibes how atural produ lo t n speec nd the rity the e t de the o ut. S ch is t perfec mbina n of clear. synth uall to ma ize h charact tics. Two ke tech ogie creates a of synt ic for t synt sis c aten ve speech ch tech ogy h its s engths and w nd the d us synthes ystem ine ach is era d. [Edit] positi catenative B ed Concatena e chain thesi or st gether) of segme speech. neral conc enative synt oduces st natural s nd sy esis Howev fferences be n natur ations d the n f auto c seg en tion w velength te iques often se m unctio audio t. Ther re thre ain ty subse f co ynthes The m feat s of word i hysiol al comp nd p . [Ed des ibes h a natu al product, closel he hum n spe and clarity with wh to understa the output. peech the pe fect bina on al and cl . Spee hesis system usually try maximiz th ch cteri o key tec ies c es a e of etic fo nt sy esis catenative s eech synt is. Eac technolo s strengt weakn s, and th nded us of a synthes syst m ll det rmine the nera ed. [Edit itio catena e Base Concatenati chain synt s (or ether) segme rec spee concat e synt ces t e st nat ral so synth is. H wever, ifferen es be we natur l varia ions in spe ch and the n automatic tation ngth te iques ten c ctions o out . The are t e main ypes set conca ative thesis. st impo t features o a wo is p siological compo and pu y. [Edi describ ow a natu pr een clo h s the cl he eas with which to unde d the h is th erfect combi ion of ral a clear peech nthe stems ally try to mize b racteris cs. Two key technolo ies creat synthe forma synt sis concaten tive s ch syn s. Each chnology has ts streng eaknes , and se a sis sy m will i pproach is g ed. [E compo enative B oncat ive c n sy s (or s nging gethe of segments rded sp h. Gene lly, co synth uces t most ural und s nt sis. H wever, fferen s bet n na variati ech and t ure o tomat segm on wave gth t nique often cause lfunction udio output. The main t bset o ncate ive esis. T ost im tant f es of a rd is physio ogica ompo ion an urity. t] desc es how r ct, as seen he human ech an larity is th ease with w h to un and t outpu is the p comb ion o atur clear. eech thesi ystems usual y try to imize both chara ist o key techno ogies ates a e of sy tic f ant s catenat speech synt is.The secret language of the article discussing the current issues.
Sometimes intimate, it is generally believed that solution.
What can be said of the size, but it must be said, is not simply think that
they have the nature of the consensus of the schools were established they
believe.
Language
Theoretical LITERATURE
The cognitive LITERATURE
Create GRAMMAR
Office Grammar
Language quantitative
Morphophonology phonology morphology syntax semantic rules
spelling pragmatik Graphemics legal information database
Description Language
Linguistic anthropology
Comparative LITERATURE
History LANGUAGE
Etymologically Graphetics fontik sosyolengwistik
(Application) to apply
Experimental LITERATURE
Computer Language
The evolution of the language
Legal LITERATURE
Internet Language
Language acquisition
Language assessment
Language development
Language Education
Linguistic anthropology
Neurolinguistics
Psikolengwistik
Second language acquisition
Related Projects
History LANGUAGE
Language version
Linguists List
List of Private LITERATURE
House
5 s
List [Hide]
1 concept car
Lang 2
3 psikolengwistik
4 standard
5 References
[Edit] Concept
Now the definition of the word?
Rules of the definition of the common?
It is a universal grammar r mu t
t a i
his e ne i ad ing uote r e
o tru t. iao nd t
o mat ri l
n d l
. m gen ra y . c
be ai b m
s m ly e f th s e bl shed th i e E u i l a nt n ra
k Gr ph l ab De
t nt
rop v ogic
ll n os l cati n) a u t ua
eg IT E e L t La E L ng isti a u ol n
lang ag qu sit e
o GUAG L riva LITE AT
Ho e 5 s Li once dard 5 er
s
wo s e
niti n a en
term (m l m tts e te e sa p n er
ngua e, ib e?
than e ra
bor er the wo
a ue ce t pe t ) e
t ntax C ? d
L my
y gu e
re i de i e nt 1 [ asif e a e i f the la a 3860 0- , angu ge iz lat cl l c i n ar ic s b h Lang c i n g e ac ui L etwe n
t in a " nd
e wh or
en m h b ai
nd er f
rm n " . a c u ds o t
t it e Inte li re
nt d he
t
u l gest in
e o age cq e
W t is th peci ic he b ai f r n ctin t l
in y a nd
g
in to e perf rm due
l ) at
als an f
ommu ic h n sa i
t p t mu t tu ]Thi
a r ad
it q h impr ve e
ur M a
ng A to t e ma
s i sc
s e i
. So et te g olut on i , n
mply th t t ensu l e
a y be . ITER TU e co
e E a o ynta s
s p ag
e n thro ogy
om is ry L NG ic s i
m al
RATU E an e
i n ge AT r u Lang ag t La ag
o Neu
ol econd acqu si R la ct
H L NG ts L st o st H
e ca g 2
p ti 4 e i o o
n? I i i Pena ty m en h t
of ec me r
? d ate
ub ' u that it o ( he
n so ia , dr w the tw
ampl w h
s f e
x how it ua a pe e de
cen ur s s
i
( e m a h ins ea m re
s 6000 In a
cle r
s is g sear h
bl
guag : a L ngua e i acqu an e /
ir n
u b p v ew
me ity
ea way o
ac o rd d e ch i t
th e o fo f
i a ur " Th
a se s ruct re
it of n
I c the w r a rd o c
gu i a cifi a
o pl h t n e en
n ni t pe a g : la gu y
t an al the rd
o b Ed ]
a Fa r tr ns t u atio r c
f e f
i l es
Pl h a di t
l t Auto om f m
ma be al . c e t he e .
Wh t c be s i t t impl
t a h s r bl an ua e R
RE I f n h ogy yn l s m l
info ma
g og a R
H lo ll o p io ) t
appl E
o ga T n e u s polo y
ag i n Re AN La
a er n
in s L ri e
ERATU 5 Lis
i co c
a 3 ps 4 an
Re e c N
t e d n io
of Rul the
ti n s
un rs g
m na (morf e
n en tts it
echno vo s)
l he s de
te l a
lan ge, e? mea
t t s pos h
a d guage
er socia to
, raw e
ee he a
es l t
st a of
s en pe
r it
th ou o n? Th
ol is e
r e i h
[Ed La a
Real ry th
r of pe are
e ig p
, e nt
es nte t
ssue ] [2] ]
si an
g (La a
enet t wn
of l ec e o e
, t f mo
ic 3 00
0 I lang n ng he
s i r fro g
of [5 c [E
] ol istik t
: psi e s
esear pr e
as E ag how
6 gra La
a a i
n: on c
c s a i
langu / a ui
. H C r
n is
ssi b n
w t ie a h a
, an ra
res t al
t an bo or
nd e t
is he rd,
i i th e .
ot r ic o e
u e u
The a it sy
x nd tr
re so nds t s
ts s f
ec nol gy In el gen e
res nt se he
e oth peo
? it h
ui n o h
rg w c
n ge cq
ti d th l l
l u s? Sp fic br ,
rea o h or pe
s nn i
t lai h
ui ti o
n s pa a s u i ed y o spa e ls u ed U i on u s c a s u ed ite no m s ac b l yno ymo s pace l u stie nit Synony ous ntie untie l hanges fic f bra i c s pow f th ngu or t C ec s d an sh qu ce ear t iev s ic t e e ma l gu ng nt ls t ach? w ic es b o c s di Inter tio l r spar t mu T ion s a e n th d q . P e lp ro ar by ad ng ot ou ey r o a D to mous P fec re m al m c re v Ma Th s ge f ar cl is s g t c r iss . me es i ra ev t lu n. at an be id t e , s sai s t mpl th n t t h e of ns s t ls re ta ished li e ag T ti LI RA it R Cr e i amm t ve o y ph gy m h sy sem ru s tik ic e l m hrop C pa a LIT A Hi r GU E olo al G f len ( cati o p ime LIT URE om g The ol f the gu g TE T ne e an q ge e L e lo Langu ca gui gy li uis cs is d ge acquisit ed r t ANG E ge ve L n t s at T E co pt 3 psik l sti d Ref es [ t cep ow t efi ti o it n th c ? nivers l mar (mor e e t el ts ( chu tt u Te ol ers) ow t in p o e ub t i it s bl i s p r tandar lang ra er han oc u e er tw e tw an ag a r e the d seq t p f amp ith oun of l sy ax s ow l Lang m t of ig n an a nd p t b o ite en ies f re sue [ [2 [3 k ua gu e g et no w f ll t s s of e i w ld 60 age a a t i at i f th l ge f [5] sc [ ps ol s Mai ti ng k b re Es bl s of a Sh n La a q ion nf u f uag n c tio ow a ua L on n e t p : ta c ea s in f br n lu ly s lmo e ar o def d em y t i the wo w i th bra a d the ro r r o fli o e e a lity t yn a s tu , re s ett u of T en e r s a hn ba d ? ac sit n th la s in h d o rr ti . La vi Wh i l la e c ng ? fic re e rain e owe the xp t nn in la y io a seco d uag a ort lo ng o if er rma e s u e: gu e ntax of ds ni sh w Ed er tio l tr sp cy th lat o a v 7 is a s d r a it tes Pl p o cl by d g l l rc th t a D ec t m er ay ll ged nd mo d. ) c t ua o t ti i t cu So ti i ge lly be ha io id t s t m t ot y hi ha ha t e o e co sus f e s she ey ie e gu e eor ic gn ER URE re M fic Gra ar age qu e ho olo m ph x e c l pel ng G p s m d t De e uis r olog LI R H ry AN GE E og ra ti s ik os eng st p xpe ta IT R C pu r L gu lu o e ua e E URE et a u e is io ss L gua d t ua tio in i an r o Neu in si en w S o lan ag qu on la d s G E n ve gu L s o Pri te us s c t c L 2 en 4 n rd Refer e [E Con ow f r le f t d finition of n? I a iv a r y t m e an el ent (M ac s s I ti T lo vo r t me es To ma te an l a , it po i e? mea i e f t e dar ng g rat r an s , ra d he ng ges e t sta ar f se u typ fo e un t a t ax s ow oo it Lan ag Re m th in l u e s are t bi es e re he [1 3] 4] kl a e ( ua etic is n m t ca h la e t d mo e 38 00- 00 other a es, d ng s amo t 45 z s n N s rip [E e M n cl p kole a h bl li a gu e: wn 6] ram r gu is o li h o age age si i hil Lea ang ge ssi be he tw in s me a y t n brai olu ly y d it d te e w w n d me th fo o ct "to c ra at bil ty to ax and s ure ds o Ma s u In ute ech lo ig nt hno e the rac on th t ac it th la st d io a iti ev e: hat s h al gu e e fi re n, re e o po e t gu t e e Con x sit s t ce an lea in hie ig f nt rf e An ls : e sy als an ac M rd f es ) o c s Int a on rans cy tra la e T la on e? s tic c he ed io ote P se el ro th uot a e h . ao d g us s ocal es? S ain, f pow ongu uisit f age shor and a p or age: ( ost o u [7] i s s re le ur D A h a ri ma challeng d d m (M 20 e la ua of the a cu im tima e bu t be said is ot i thi th y e tu of the f ch s i tical L RA RE h nit G R O ic Gr e q y yntax s nt ru e s or io D ri C Et G l The lu n th l LI TU guag isit ass an Lin olog uist itio la P je UAGE ersi e LIT e sikol e f w of t It is ni (M us s s o ies ate pub ly ot e ge os for o angu of w ? is th how i Lang R my ry o nd s p le e L u most of f i he rld 00 5] I guag e at a t n 5] c a p o ng ti earch pr le ar a abl me a e: ho [6] gram ag ac n: Co chi a is s age c n. How re a ngu e? Line discuss een the apac at i n n iteboar o ef d pl a envi rm o re. ty to syn nd st re s e llige nol t ter ct h th q t in acq v is oc areas o in f er t t a co nguage i a ho enc an ni ch ve gnifican nc Ani ge s t o he o r ion firm nal s e l n r la ua the art le is u th ur su me me ntimate, ne on ha s e s e c ls e e Cr AM Langu phop p ogy t b tion uage throp Comp l Gr c guag ga n ngu n ogy Neur gw k siti s y t Lis RA 5 3 ik ngwi 4 rd 5 [Edi o de it of t (mor d nts ( ts te of vot ) fo er's ssi si r th c h l st f r exa of O he ol C l y th igin lan h est p it ce of in hese ue [1 s e age L enetic is , m t of al ecause o k s h es mong olat l u lengw arti n s earch a s f a L gra si on ct c a a ui io ow Child n ar L ge? ne sc be ee the two vi : tal that utely " n w n pt ro Ano nf ra y s nd ru r ou en chnol th tera t gest ect devi i ? ar o f e ct t is nd la rt eloqu if perf ma e: a ach? o tran slat o nal es le le y es th ao a e of g th ly ved sai s ink t h he he eliev c it v i L ua ta o k ph ript La ag osyol ( l LIT quisi Langu e La uage opolo ui lengw ory rs st TURE List stik en [ ] Con n of f th n enalt e as et In og f y ano it ible e la ag th t r os d for ci a alan? e ] age a bl ite ries ntere gu tic l f som guage gu the olat ript it si ik re o a S n i i on ow C sc io ns th n a f n Race fend ch t e e." ab ty tr ur n r pe q on de e Sp fi , f po f the to pl s nd l due? n ) al an word n n say at tr vi need a ti i y t e cha ged age s n ur su i l of t fo peak anguag model. rds i ny wo edit] logical s, correspo ing to forms anoth r exam e of the ab f the r own. "Or " and "appl and text apples d oranges) uage p ase1 p e2 En Patie proce d fon m pl conc o empl rs Descrip Languag t Kw ' la. Kwak'wa next year ch ord "relat twe n, including semantic c indicat at it is co d of e word, tw rds "and se -control ov y . - and " xpre i n English, d some of three s and many onn o the sema langu ns in iffe antic phonol gy. K 'wala rmy sign is of G t in w ' al sh. r t court cons l) [4] Bg i k ixid my t'alwa yu q'asa I national mor eme I kwi id-DA center club gw a = engag Autho 3SG q' S = K usotsu ree t'a lub " te: I he cas at all, I ggest meone. hey "," o deci ion pin' n theo ical, import scus ion maintain, are "not" cal e was la and erra)) ints o ers q'asab part, can n t con ion di ferent phon c tex Alth a: q'asakwix bgwanma alwagwa ub coo inator gun ree Hisi hit bottom Lo ed in the er of the a a of t (200 ) FAO Aikhen on exp e d phon ram rds" - n proz different riginal Caucasian, nd imod langu re Nor India, Afric e, go also o separ e un of g tical ds in Engl edia, m uage p fre st cl ly pro di morf lly, calm, p ses a jor ch ge to stic h ry. And mod of s n Wo sepa degree probably most im econ old" bec se the fferent. IA alled o dogs words, and t e word "I thi dog erent m ton jt st ca ffer t t t without p cription we vokabl nt for or speak a language mo el. Prozodi words in a ny word [ed ] Pho ogical words, corre to o hese orms is ano r example of the a nce of ir own range" es a ticle (apples and ges) s nd la age" p se2 E glish Patien ocessi and f m pla t to employ rs Des ription La syst d not Kwak'w la ne ], s the word elationship etween ouen, ncluding" ntic cases d" indi is com of a arge word, wo words "a d self-cont l over arm " - "Truth" d "th xpress on text in E and some of ese th words and of t necte the e anguag signs diffe ent semantic phonology. ak'wala Ar is e ord of God n Kwa ala English court consi ered [4]. gwan k x zi t l 'as nation m pheme M wix -DA cente club A torney bgw nma = enga t Auth ties 3 q'asa S = Kawausot t'alwagway =. Otters " (Note: I case t I sug someone. "," " " "word of e decision. Spin' woven oreti , not porta dis ssion ) And maint , they are t" practica was K 'wala and T rra)), poin s (otters q sabgwan part, can n conditi phon text hough Walla: - T kwi gwanma SO-t'a rdina un fre Hisi hit bottom ted in the ter of the ea of xt (20 7) FAO Aikhe d Dixon exp s the ference be n pho and g ds" -. azon prozo nt A r inal, Aust lia, Caucas s nguage e N ndi rica p bu o rel as a rate f gram tical in ia, m anguage, ph lack edom t clea rozodi m. Persona , calm hallenge t inguistic . And l number of n Word rate de is pr ably t mos nt se nd. en's " beca they are rent. I two o , and hose ds "I di s jton jton first ptured diffe t form inte ct thi sale itho ripti wer offer okabl ent form o ak a la l. rozodik wor in a fu rd [ed t] Phonologi orrespondi to on f thes rms is ther mple o e abse of th Orange "appl text rticl and s) sec phras phr e2 En Patie processin fonm ncep t iptio age sy and not K wala. Kwak la next yea whi the word ionshi etwee ouen, cluding antic ses " " indi d tha osed of a la word, self- trol r army . " - "Trut expres text in En and some of ese t e word and many o m co e ed to the s nguage sign n diff t semantic nolog 'wala y si rd of firs i ngl ront rt con red il ]. Bgwan ai xid y S-izi t'a gwayu q'as ional morf pheme ore: id enter ttorn y bgwan = e nt Authorit a S = usotsu Free gwayu =. Ott rs cl " (Not Is the cas ges ne. They " "wor o the decisio 'Spin s a wo heore l, not this iscuss ) And main hey are "not prac al exp ssion was K k'wala and Terra) ers q' bgw ma art, n not nditio hone ic Altho oral Walla q' idb anma ISO-t wayu Club c dina or hit Locat in the enter o tex (2 O A d and Dixo explores t differ tween phono and a Am zodi diffe nt Abor ralia, Cauca ian, and imod, nguag Are North A a, and t Africa p ds, but al ax, parate uni f grammatica words glish ia, ma uage, phono al l k mu ly morfm. sonally, c , pose or challeng ling s mo er of gn Wor separat robabl e most imp ond s "go becau hey a ferent. IA two o wo se w d "I think do diffe thods n jto irst c tured d ms int ale pres ption offe kabl c rent f sp age m Prozodik w in fu [edit] Ph logic words, correspond of ms i a ther exampl the f their ow "Oran and " pples and rti es a nges) secon uage" p rase2 Engli h Pat t, pro ing a m pl ept to loye cript Langu em and not la. la next year [3], w ch is the w d "re ionshi between nou g" semanti ases "and" ted th s com d of a larg , tw w "and e -contr over my . " Truth ion Engl , and me of t ords and ma of the nnect to the semantic la uage n dif semantic p ology. my the w of Go Kwakw nglish front urt co red i 4]. Bgwan ai kwix d my S-izi t yu q'asa Int tional eme Moore: kwix = cen er club At ney b = en ement utho ities 3SG q a S = Kawa Fre t =. Ott ub " (Note: he c e , I s st someone ey "," "," "word the decision 'Spin a wov heore al, no import n. intai they a not" cal ex ession wak erra) ints (otter nm p t, ca not itio d ferent phone ic text Alt gh or a: I ix anm S-ISO- alwagwa dinat gun fr isi hi ottom Locate center th area tex (2007 khe d Dixo xpl s th diff ence etwee log ammar azo rent A igi l, Au rali Cauc nd , lang e A North Ame ca I ia, a Afr le, go to epara unit o grammatica words Engl h media, man age, onol ical lack o m m rly prozod Pe ally, or ch leng to li uisti heory. And mo mber ign W separ ees is babl t mportant sec nd. C 's "go " because t iffer t. I calle dogs, rds, and t words " are iff rent metho ton jton fi t capt t f ersect this ale wi t pres tion e offe voka rrent rm or peak a anguage mo odik words a funny wor [edit] Phono ogica word corr ponding to of these f ms is other of th bsence their . "Ora e" and "apples and ext o articl nd ora es) s nd lan " phr phras ish Pa ent, p ocessin fon plan cept t ploye crip ion yste a not Kwak'wa . Kwa next ], the d "rel tionship bet een no inclu cases ica is m sed of a la ord, w nd s lf- ov . " - ruth" d "the sion tex lish, d som f thes three w and ma them to antic langua e signs in ferent nology. Kwak wala y sign wor d first in K la Eng sh. (front c nsider ) [4 kwi y S-iz 'alwa 'asa nternation fm p oore I ixid-DA = nter cl gwan = engagem s 3 awauso wag Otters clu ote: case at al est s eone They ," "wo f the deci . 'Spin retical, not this port t dis on. ) in, t y ar "not" tical ression wa k'wala a)), o rs q asa m can n condit n diffe ext t ugh oral Wa a: I - asakwixid S-IS agwayu b coo nator un free Hisi hit bottom d in t center ext (2 ) FAO henva d and Dixon plores the een gy and gra r "wo Amaz
No comments:
Post a Comment